Love Jesus More than Justice

Homily for the Twenty-Third Sunday in Ordinary Time, 2022

Fr. Samuel Keyes 9/4/2022

If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple (Luke 14:26).

What in the world is going on here? Most of us hear this passage and immediately try to deconstruct it for what it must be really saying. Surely, we say, this isn’t really about hate; it’s about priorities. So it’s not that we should hate our fathers and mothers and so on, but that we should not love them too much. And we can all think of examples where people (not us, obviously) do that.

To be fair, there does exist in Hebrew literary culture a tendency to hyperbole. So maybe there’s a bit of rhetorical exaggeration here in Jesus’ comments. But he still says what he says, and it’s still jarring, so it’s worth asking whether he really wants us to jump straight to the easier message of “get your priorities in order.”

I want to draw here from one of my old professors, Stanley Hauerwas, who is famous for never passing up an opportunity to say something provocative. In a piece called “Hating Mothers as the Way to Peace,” he points out how love is so often at the heart of conflict:

Our violence lies not in ourselves but in our loves. We think it crucial to protect those we love. Indeed, I suspect most of us go to war to protect our loves. Our families, our neighborhoods are what we care about when we go to war—nations are but symbols of those cares.

I’d guess this resonates with most of us. It is often the case that soldiers fight less for some idea about the nation or about virtue than in simple defense of those they love. Any father or mother, sister or brother gets this. And I often say that fatherhood brought out depths of anger that I never knew I had! I’m not just talking about the frustrations of children—I’m talking about this deeply ingrained fighting instinct against those who might in any way hurt my children.

We’re all familiar with that moment in the Garden of Gethsemane when Peter draws a sword to defend his Lord. We all want to do that. Love demands it. But, Jesus tells us, as he tells Peter there, this love has to be transformed.

Here’s Hauerwas again:

We no longer need desperately try to ensure the survival of those we love, for we can now love them with the security and the conviction that God’s kingdom is surely here. In short, Jesus brought the end time so that we may have the time to love without that love becoming the source of our violence.

Let’s put it this way: Christianity isn’t in the first instance about protecting the innocent. Yes, Catholic tradition is very strong in its recognition of and witness to natural kinds of justice. But such witness has more to do with authentic created human nature than it does with the gospel. In fact, the death and resurrection of Jesus have given us a fundamentally new context for any discussion of justice in the world. Our hope does not depend in any way on our success in preserving the innocent from suffering, or on stopping all injustice, or on protecting those we love.

After all, as a people we already done the worst thing we could possibly do. We killed God.

Sometimes, showing a rather casual forgetfulness of this huge cosmic history, modern Christians love to go around promoting causes. Sometimes they’re very good causes that should be promoted, like the integrity of the natural human family and the protection of children. But there is a danger here that we need to acknowledge. The chief task of the Church isn’t just going around declaring that this or that thing is bad. The chief task of the Church is to tell the world that the ultimate source of all this evil is the world’s rejection of Jesus. We can correct this or that injustice all day, but until we get to this most basic reality our work will always be incomplete.

Which brings us to our epistle, which is an excerpt from St. Paul’s short letter to Philemon. To refresh our memory, here’s the story. Philemon is a wealthy Christian who was converted through Paul’s ministry. Onesimus was his slave. Onesimus runs away, but while he is away he himself encounters Paul and becomes a Christian. Paul sends him back to his former master with this letter, which effectively says, Onesimus is now, like you, the slave of Christ. So treat him as such.

When you study this letter in an academic context, pretty quickly the discussion moves to the big question. Why doesn’t Paul just outright condemn slavery? It’s pretty clear that he doesn’t envision Onesimus just going back to his former life, but from a modern perspective it’s weird that Philemon isn’t called out for owning slaves in the first place. Cue the modern critics who see this as yet another example of how backward Christianity is.

But what if Paul understands that it’s not really sufficient for the Church simply to condemn an evil practice? What if he understands that what is at stake is not just something like getting our priorities in order or preventing suffering, but a radical new form of the human family centered on our incorporation into the resurrected Jesus? He who does not hate mother or father or sister or brother or slave or master or even life itself for my sake cannot be my disciple. The big picture matters. We can get our priorities in order, we can avoid loving things too much, but without Jesus none of this will matter very much. We can promote justice and make the world a better place, but without Jesus the world will still choose darkness rather than light.

The only way to avoid hate is to love Jesus first and above all else. Because it is only when we love people and things for his sake, and in his love, that those loves can become the real love that can last through death.

The Sin of Sloth

Sure, sloth is captured in the image of the guy on the couch doing nothing. But did you know that the workaholic is also a slothful man?

Leon J. Suprenant 9/5/2022

When many of us think of sloth, we probably conjure up images of an ugly South American animal that eats shoots and actually hangs around. Or maybe we think of unshaven Joe Sixpack lying on the sofa all weekend, not lifting a finger except to open another cold one.

The latter is a fairly apt image of the vice of sloth or its synonyms, such as boredom, acedia, and laziness. Boredom refers to a certain emptiness of soul or lack of passion. Acedia refers to the sadness that comes from our unwillingness to tackle the difficulties involved in attaining something good. Laziness more generally refers to the torpor and idleness of one who is not inclined to exert himself.

Sloth encompasses all these ideas and more. In his Pocket Catholic Dictionary, the late Jesuit Fr. John Hardon defined sloth as “sluggishness of soul or boredom because of the exertion necessary for the performance of a good work. The good work may be a corporal task, such as walking; or a mental exercise, such as writing; or a spiritual duty, such as prayer.”

One might have the impression that sloth is not a typically American sin. The virtues of diligence and industriousness are deeply ingrained in our nation’s Protestant work ethic. Our youth learn early on that the way to get ahead—at least for those who don’t win the lottery—is by working hard. The early bird catches the worm. Early to bed, early to rise. In a competitive, dog-eat-dog business world, everyone is looking for an “edge,” and that typically comes from outworking the competition.

And even apart from an employment context, when we want to communicate that our lives have been normal and healthy, we report that we’ve been “keeping busy.”

Surely the Church has always championed the intrinsic goodness of human work, through which we become “co-creators” with God and exercise legitimate stewardship over creation. In his 1981 encyclical letter on human work (Laborem Exercens), Pope John Paul II writes, “Work is a good thing for man—a good thing for his humanity—because through work man not only transforms nature, adapting it to his own needs, but he also achieves fulfillment as a human being and indeed, in a sense, becomes ‘more a human being’” (9).

Yet sloth is a sin against God, and not against the time clock or productivity. The fact is that it’s possible to work too much, in a way that’s not in keeping with our dignity and ultimate good. The essence of sloth is a failure to fulfill one’s basic duties. Surely one such duty is the human vocation to work. Yet another such duty is the enjoyment of leisure, to take time for worship. The gentleman lying on the sofa may be a more popular image of sloth, but the workaholic, who’s on the job 24-7 and in the process neglects God and family, is the more typical manifestation of sloth in our culture.

Work and leisure are both products of human freedom, and both are intimately tied to our ultimate good. Most of us understand and periodically struggle with the natural aversion to work, but why do we find it so difficult to enjoy leisure? Why do we consign ourselves to a joyless workaholism instead of striking a healthy balance in our lives? There are many reasons for this strange phenomenon, but I’d like to point out a few contributing factors that reflect the spiritual malaise of our time.

First, Pope John Paul II, in his 1995 encyclical Evangelium Vitae, identified “the heart of the tragedy being experienced by modern man: the eclipse of the sense of God and of man” (21). He noted that “when the sense of God is lost, there is also a tendency to lose the sense of man, of his dignity and his life.” The Holy Father was speaking to us: we in the West have largely lost the sense of God, leading to a loss of our own sense of purpose or mission. This has inexorably led to societal emptiness and a lack of passion. A striking correlation exists between the rise of secular atheism and boredom, as the reduction of human existence to the merely material divests it of its intended richness and meaning. This can only lead to the worldly sadness that leads to despair and ultimately death (see 2 Cor. 7:10).

The most typical way of dealing with this tragedy is by not dealing with it, so as a society, we tend to flock to entertainments. Certainly, these things are not bad in themselves, but excessive recourse to them reveals a flight from the depths of the human condition to the comfort of shallow pastimes. These pursuits are rightly called diversions, because they divert us from facing a life from which the living God has been excluded. For some, these diversions may be sports, television, or the internet, among other possibilities. For others, work becomes a diversion, an escape. When it does, it ceases to be a manifestation of virtue and instead feeds the vice of sloth.

In addition, modern man tends to define himself by what he does and what he has. Yet leisure isn’t about producing and owning, but about being—in other words, resting in God’s presence. We often fail to recognize the immense God-given dignity and value we have simply by being who we are, which is prior to anything we might accomplish in life. In Augustinian terms, without allowing for leisure, our hearts are forever restless, and our sense of worth gets tied to what we’re able to produce. This utilitarian mindset not only drives us to overwork, but also negatively affects how we value others. That’s one reason why our society has such a difficult time valuing the elderly and the infirm in our midst.

Further, as the pursuit of success, acclaim, or riches becomes the source of our personal worth, these human goods in essence take the place of God in our lives. Few of us probably set out to become idolaters, but that’s what we’ve become if our choices and work habits are ordered toward serving mammon, not God (Matt. 6:24; CCC 2113).

In response to all this, I offer a three-part plan for battling and overcoming the vice of sloth.

1. Remember to keep holy the Lord’s Day.

I recently had the occasion to reread Pope John Paul II’s magnificent 1998 apostolic letter Dies Domini, on keeping the Lord’s Day holy. It’s hard to single out “favorites” from among John Paul’s voluminous writings, but surely this meditation on the Lord’s Day will benefit Christians “with ears to hear” for many generations to come.

One passage of Dies Domini really struck me: “[the Sabbath is] rooted in the depths of God’s plan. This is why, unlike many other precepts, it is not set within the context of strictly cultic stipulations but within the Decalogue, the ‘ten words’ which represents the very pillars of the moral life inscribed on the human heart” (13).

Sunday Mass is not simply another requirement imposed on us by a Church that’s obsessed with “rules.” Rather, the obligation to remember to keep the day holy is prefigured and rooted in the commandment to keep the Sabbath day holy, which in turn is rooted in the act of creation. And by creation I mean both God’s creation of the world, from which he took his rest on the seventh day, and God’s creation of us. This call to worship, to rest from servile labor, to take stock of all that God has given us, is inscribed in who we are, and we are acting against our own good when we fail to remember to keep Sunday holy. As our Lord noted, the Sabbath is made for man, and not the other way around.

On top of all that, we are commanded to “remember” to keep the day holy, which suggests that we might tend to “forget.”

When it comes to tithing our money, assuming that we even make an effort to support the Church financially, we look for the minimum we can get by with. God also asks us to tithe our time, to give him one day per week. In a similar sense, we’ve reduced the Lord’s Day to Sunday Mass, and even then, we squawk if it lasts more than 45 minutes. We can’t get out of Church fast enough once we’ve “done our time.”

But as long as we view the Sunday obligation minimally and as a burden, we’re missing the point. Although Sunday Mass is the source and summit of our Christian life for the week, the entire Lord’s Day should be set aside for God and family—in other words, for leisure and for freedom from servile labor. Surely there must be some flexibility in application, especially given our diverse, secular culture, but I daresay just as we can probably do a better job of tithing our money, we can do a better job of remembering to observe the Lord’s Day.

2. Take stock of our schedule.

Time is one of our most valued commodities, and we should spend it in a way that reflects our values and priorities. Getting the Lord’s Day right is the first and most important step, but we still have six other days to order correctly. Faith, family, work, and other pursuits are like ingredients that need to be added at the right time and in the right measure to make a tasty dish. If we don’t take the time to read and follow the recipe, the ingredients won’t come together.

That’s why it’s so important for individuals, couples, families, and communities to take the time to identify their priorities and commitments and schedule their days and weeks accordingly. For those of us who tend to be lazy “underachievers,” a schedule will keep us on task. For those of us who tend toward workaholism and to be driven by the tyranny of the urgent, a schedule will make sure that we make time for prayer, reading to the kids, or other priorities that might get shoved aside if we’re not vigilant.

3. Cultivate virtue.

If we’re not actively engaged in cultivating virtue, then our lives will start looking like my lawn. There are some patches of grass, but each day there are also more weeds. Overcoming vice and developing virtue go together, just as it’s not enough to pull weeds without also planting and fertilizing the new grass.

When it comes to sloth, the corresponding virtues are justice, charity, and magnanimity. Sloth is about fulfilling our obligations to God and neighbor, which brings into play the various manifestations of justice. However, the motivation for fulfilling these obligations should be supernatural charity, which moves us out of our small, self-serving world so that we might live for others.

When the spiritual laxity of sloth overtakes us, we are like a football team that has lost its momentum. We are set back on our spiritual heels and feel ill-prepared to do what is necessary to turn the tide. From this perspective, we can see how the “end game” of sloth is despair, as eventually the negative momentum snowballs, and we lose the will to compete. Magnanimity, however, literally means being “great-souled”; it is the virtue that gives us the confidence that we can do all things in him who strengthens us (Phil. 4:13), that we can truly run so as to win (1 Cor. 9:24).

Each time we act against our disinclination to pray, as well as work into our day habits of prayer (e.g., saying a Hail Mary when we’re stopped in traffic) and sacrifice, we are replacing sloth with virtues that will help us become saints. And it all starts with getting up off the couch and onto our knees.