New Revelation Sugar Industry Covered Up Serious Disease Link 50 Years Ago

By Heather CallaghanEditor

You may have heard of the sugar industry’s attempt to get dietary fat blamed for heart disease when it manipulated results to cover up sugar’s role in cardiovascular illness. There is more to the story…

Last year, three researchers turned heads everywhere when they uncovered evidence that the sugar industry secretly funded studies on sugar’s effects on mammals, only to then cut off from the results when sugar’s links to life-threatening disease emerged.

Instead, the sugar industry emphasized the role of dietary fat and sat back while high-fat foods took all the blame and Americans unwittingly continued to consume a toxic, disease-causing, refined product. This propaganda stunt not only caused other Big Food sectors to kick their own PR games into high gear, but also inadvertently created a decades-old inflammatory, hydrogenated-oil monstrosity that continues today.

SEE: Herbal Extract Found To Curb Appetite And Regulate Blood Sugar

Now, a year later, the researchers are back at it! Science Daily reports*:

A U.S. sugar industry trade group appears to have pulled the plug on a study that was producing animal evidence linking sucrose to disease nearly 50 years ago, researchers argue in a paper publishing on November 21 in the open access journal PLOS Biology.

Researchers Cristin Kearns, Dorie Apollonio and Stanton Glantz from the University of California at San Francisco reviewed internal sugar industry documents and discovered that the Sugar Research Foundation (SRF) funded animal research to evaluate sucrose’s effects on cardiovascular health. When the evidence seemed to indicate that sucrose might be associated with heart disease and bladder cancer, they found, the foundation terminated the project without publishing the results.

Previously, it was discovered that the SRF had secretly funded a 1967 review article that downplayed evidence linking refined sugar consumption to coronary heart disease. That review noted that gut microbes may explain why rats fed sugar had higher cholesterol levels than those fed starch, but dismissed any relevance for humans.

SEE: Regular Sugar Heals Leg Ulcers And Other Skin Wounds

In the new paper, however, published this week in PLOS Biology,

…the team reports that the following year, SRF (which had changed its name in 1968 to the International Sugar Research Foundation, or ISRF) launched a rat study called Project 259 ‘to measure the nutritional effects of the [bacterial] organisms in the intestinal tract’ when sucrose was consumed, compared to starch.

The ISRF-funded research on rats by W.R.F. Pover of the University of Birmingham suggested that gut bacteria help mediate sugar’s adverse cardiovascular effects. Pover also reported findings that might indicate an increased risk of bladder cancer. “This incidental finding of Project 259 demonstrated to ISRF that sucrose vs. starch consumption caused different metabolic effects,” Kearns and her colleagues argue, “and suggested that sucrose, by stimulating urinary beta-glucuronidase, may have a role in the pathogenesis of bladder cancer.”

The ISRF described the finding in a September 1969 internal document as “one of the first demonstrations of a biological difference between sucrose and starch fed rats.” But soon after ISRF learned about these results — and shortly before the research project was complete —the group terminated funding for the project, and no findings from the work were published.

Project 259 would have provided helpful evidence that there is a difference to human health between consuming refined sugar and starch which occurs abundantly in many nutritious vegetables, ancient grains and fruits. In the 1960s, scientists were debating the dietary cause of raised triglycerides…

SEE: What A 70 Yr Old Woman Who Went Sugar-Free 28 Years Ago, Looks Like Today

As you can see, whole-food starches were unfairly demonized while the sugar industry sat back, reaping all the benefits from everyone’s ignorance. Even old magazine ads reveal the sugar industry making outrageous claims that sugary junk food could aid weight loss – that one could eat a chocolate bar or drink a cola before a meal to cut food consumption.

Program for Reversing Diabetes: The Scientifically Proven System for Reversing Diabetes without Drugs (Ad)

Today – cardiovascular disease remains the biggest killer in the world.

And cancer isn’t too far behind in first-world countries

Bombshell report continues…

The results suggest that the current debate on the relative effects of sugar vs. starch may be rooted in more than 60 years of industry manipulation of science. Last year, the Sugar Association criticized a mouse study suggesting a link between sugar and increased tumor growth and metastasis, saying that “no credible link between ingested sugars and cancer has been established.”

The analysis by Kearns and her colleagues of the industry’s own documents, in contrast, suggests that the industry knew of animal research suggesting this link and halted funding to protect its commercial interests half a century ago.

Co-author Stanton Glantz said:

The kind of manipulation of research is similar what the tobacco industry does -This kind of behavior calls into question sugar industry-funded studies as a reliable source of information for public policy making.

The authors concluded that extending Project 259’s funding would have been detrimental to the sugar industry. Thus, the researchers successfully unearthed solid proof of industry manipulation of science and the disease link with sugar. How sad that this revelation took generations to finally surface.

Hillary is toast: Scandals finally catch up with Clintons

Liz Peek

Imagine: even the New York Times’ Ross Douthat now thinks that Bill Clinton should have stepped down over the Monica Lewinsky affair. Douthat’s mea culpa op-ed in this past weekend’s paper, in which he confesses that he and others may have been wrong to dismiss Bill Clinton’s indefensible behavior, will serve as the official political obituary for Clinton, Inc.

Hillary Clinton is done, finished, kaput. Dogged by scandals old and new, out of step politically, her excess baggage has morphed into an entire baggage train, dragging her towards political oblivion. While it is refreshing to consider the landscape unadorned by Clintons, Republicans will miss her. Only Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have contributed as generously to GOP fund-raising efforts in recent years, or so energized voters.

Mrs. Clinton is finally being held to account, at least in the court of public opinion, where it may matter most. As charges of sexual aggression swirl around prominent figures on the left and right, Bill Clinton’s gross and possibly criminal behavior is getting a second look. New York’s junior Senator Kirsten Gillibrand took the revisionism to a whole new level when she told the New York Times that President Clinton should have stepped down when his sexual relationship with 22-year old staffer Monica Lewinsky came to light.

Though Gillibrand later tried to soften the blow by putting her statement in a modern context, the damage was done. Bill Clinton’s affairs and sexual aggression are now fair game, at a time when the country is outraged over such activities. Many have long considered Hillary’s defense of her husband hypocritical in the extreme. Even as she postured as a champion of women’s rights, she tossed Lewinsky, Juanita Broaddrick (who accused Clinton of rape), Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones under the bus.  These women accused Hillary of trying to intimidate them into silence. As recently as last year, Broaddrick broke down in tears as she recounted her 1978 ordeal. It would be hard to muster that emotion if the story were bogus.

Bill Clinton’s affairs and sexual aggression are now fair game, at a time when the country is outraged over such activities.

It is high time Bill Clinton’s misdeeds and Hillary’s defense of them received bipartisan condemnation. Gillibrand broke that sound barrier. Others have piled on, including Clinton-friendly pundits and apparatchiks like David Rothkopf, MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, and Michelle Goldberg. Liberal screed and former staffer at the Center for American Progress Matthew Iglesias wrote on Vox recently, “I think we got it wrong”, saying that defending Mr. Clinton was a mistake.

Meanwhile, there are increasing calls for a special counsel to investigate accusations that Hillary sold out the country by green-lighting the sale of Uranium One to a Russian state-linked entity, in return for cash donated to the Clinton Foundation and to Bill directly. Mrs. Clinton is in a precarious position here; as she becomes more assertive in blaming her election loss on Moscow’s intervention, she has called for ever-widening scrutiny of all things Russian. This is a risky gambit for Mrs. Clinton; comparisons between actual payments made to Clinton, Inc. and smoky speculation about “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia do not favor the former First Lady.

The Russia probe has also unearthed revelations that Hillary’s campaign shelled out millions of dollars to finance the infamous “Trump dossier,” which fed speculation about the president’s ties to Russia and how Moscow might have influenced the election. In other words, the Clinton team paid for a hit job on Trump that has been widely discredited but that ultimately led to the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the ever-expanding investigation that Democrats hope will bring down a duly elected president. It is a shocking chain of events, and one that has been extraordinarily damaging to the country.

Nonetheless, Hillary continues to tour the country, claiming with ever-greater vehemence that Russia undermined her campaign and put Donald Trump in the White House. That’s when she’s not blaming misogyny, the media, the DNC, Bernie Sanders, President Obama, James Comey and a host of others whom she considers responsible. Her tour is an embarrassment, not only for its content, but because it is yet another example of the never-ending Clinton lust for cash. She has been selling “VIP” tickets for nearly $1,200; you would think she might treat her loyal supporters to a freebie, after they doled out billions only to see her lose. The good news: plenty of websites are advertising tickets at 50 percent off.

Those steadfast supporters need some good news. Donna Brazile’s revelations that Hillary effected a clandestine takeover of the Democratic National Committee almost a year before the election, and made sure that the supposedly neutral organization pushed the nomination in her direction was salt in the wound.  Aside from the shocking disclosures, Brazile’s break with Clinton, Inc. is a sure sign that Hillary and Bill’s dominance of Democratic politics, nurtured by an incomparable fundraising behemoth, is coming to an end.

Not that they have yet ceded the floor. Last May Hillary and former DNC Chair Howard Dean launched Onward Together, a PAC established to fund groups dedicated to “encouraging people to organize, get involved and run for office.” Presumably Hillary tapped Dean for credibility in sponsoring the “progressive values” the PAC’s website claims. The Daily Caller has reported that six months in, Onward Together seems mainly intent on fundraising, with scant evidence that its revenues are being distributed to other organizations.

With the Clintons, it has always been about the money. Onward Together will be a test. If the millions roll in, the Clintons will remain a force to be reckoned with. If not, they will fade into political obscurity. Already, monies flowing into the now-tainted Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation have tumbled – down 42 percent in 2016 on top of a 37 percent drop the year before.

It’s also about the politics. Democrats have moved far to the left of Bill and Hillary. Worse for the Clintons, they are moving on.

Pope Francis fixes May 13, 2018 for World Communications Day to focus on Fake News

 The social media are a fertile ground for fake news. – AP

(Vatican Radio)  Pope Francis will focus on the harmful effects of fake news against journalism for peace, in his message for peace for World Communications Day next year. “The truth will set you free” (Jn 8:32). Fake news and journalism for peace,”is the theme of the annual Catholic Church observance that the Pope announced with a post on Twitter(@Pontifex) on Friday.

World Communications Day, the only worldwide celebration called for by the Second Vatican ‎Council ‎‎(“Inter Mirifica”, 1963), is marked in most countries, on the recommendation of the bishops of ‎the ‎world, on the Sunday before Pentecost, which in 2018 will fall on May 13.  In some countries, the day is marked as the solemnity of Ascension.

The announcement of the ‎theme is traditionally made on Sept. 29, the feast of the Archangels Michael, ‎Raphael and Gabriel, with ‎Gabriel being designated the patron saint of telecommunications.

The Holy ‎Father’s message for World ‎Communications Day is traditionally published in conjunction with January ‎‎24, feast of St. Francis de ‎Sales‎ , patron of journalists, to allow bishops’ conferences, diocesan offices and ‎communications ‎organizations sufficient time to prepare audiovisual and other materials for national ‎and local ‎celebrations. ‎

The first World Communications Day was observed on May 7, 1967, under the pontificate of Blessed Pope Paul VI, who wanted to draw attention to the communications media and the enormous power they have for cultural transformation.  Next year’s observance will be the 52nd edition.

Did James Comey Clear Hillary Clinton Before Key Witness Interviews Took Place?

For much of 2015 and 2016, conservatives waited with bated breath to hear the FBI’s verdict on whether or not Hillary Clinton was guilty of any wrongdoing as related to her private email server she had set up at her house in Chappaqua, New York. There were many claims that she had both sent and received emails she knew were classified, and it eventually came out that she had erased at least 33,000 emails and instructed her staff to destroy equipment related to the case. Voters on both the Right and the Left wanted to know if the FBI under Director James Comey would find a “smoking gun” that would call for an indictment of the nation’s top Democrat.

On July 5 of last year, Comey made public his recommendation to the then-Attorney General under ex-President Obama, Loretta Lynch, that Clinton not be indicted for any offense related to the affair, despite acknowledging that Clinton had mishandled classified information in what he called an “extremely careless” manner.

But according to newly released transcripts provided by a federal watchdog agency, there may be a problem with the timing of all of this, since it appears that Comey may have written his recommendation for the non-indictment before he personally interviewed Clinton herself and her top aides in the case. In turn, this may support President Trump’s previous assertions that he had decided to fire Comey earlier this year specifically over the Clinton affair.

The federal watchdog agency in question, the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), is an independent investigative department whose function it is to protect federal employees from being harmed by prohibited personnel practices. It interviewed two FBI higher-ups, Trisha Anderson, an FBI deputy general counsel of cyberlaw and national security, and Jim Rybicki, the former chief of staff for James Comey. Republican Senators Lindsey Graham and Chuck Grassley — the latter of whom chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee — have been looking into the case and claim that one of these two FBI officials said that Comey had decided to write a non-indictment recommendation as early as April of last year (hard copies of which began to be distributed as early as May, according to deputy general counsel Anderson).

The Clinton aides who had yet to be interviewed by Comey at the time included Hannah Reichert, an employee of the Clinton Presidential Center in Little Rock, Arkansas, Bryan Pagliano, an IT consultant to Clinton and Cheryl Mills, an attorney for Clinton. This was besides Clinton herself and 14 additional key witnesses. (Clinton was ultimately interviewed for only a few hours just three days before Comey’s July 5 announcement of his decision to the media.)

The OSC transcripts, which have multiple redactions in them — making it difficult to tell which official made which statement — nonetheless present a timeline that shows investigative malpractice, say Graham and Grassley. Specifically, they may show that Comey’s actions could have violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits a government employee from attempting to use his or her position to influence an election.

According to Comey’s chief of staff Rybicki, a message Comey is alleged to have written asked “to say, you know, again knowing sort of where — knowing the direction the investigation is headed… what would be the most forward-leaning thing we could do, right, information that we could put out about it?” Comey then allegedly formulated a draft of the recommendation that was ultimately sent to Lynch.

“These [uninterviewed witnesses] had intimate and personal knowledge relating to Secretary Clinton’s non-government server, including helping her build and administer the device,” wrote the senators in a letter to incoming FBI Director Christopher Wray, who was appointed in June by President Trump. “Conclusion first, fact-gathering second — that’s no way to run an investigation. The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy… The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts.”

Graham and Grassley have requested that the FBI turn over all drafts of Comey’s statement closing the Clinton investigation as well as related records of internal bureau communications. Both senators have also questioned the “highly unusual immunity agreements” that the Department of Justice (DOJ) under Lynch made in June 2016 with attorney Mills and Heather Samuelson, an ex-Clinton staffer who worked for her. These agreements allowed for the destruction of Mills’ and Samuelson’s laptops after the DOJ examined them. They also prevented the FBI from looking at emails between Mills, Samuelson and Clinton after Clinton left the State Department.

The senators believe these agreements also prevented the FBI from looking at records related to conference calls Mills had with a man named Paul Combetta, an employee of Platte River Networks, the Denver, Colorado-based IT firm that Clinton used for archiving many of the emails on her server. Combetta admitted to destroying copies of Clinton’s emails using BleachBit software in August of 2014 after he had a conference call with Clinton’s legal team.

Combetta had initially invoked the Fifth Amendment in testimony to the House of Representatives regarding the deletion, but later agreed to cooperate with the FBI investigation into Clinton in exchange for immunity. It should be noted that Combetta was the first of all persons connected to the case to be granted immunity, with Samuelson, Milla, Pagliano and Clinton herself following, in that order.

If all of the above is true, it supports arguments that the decision to exonerate Clinton was “rigged” from the beginning and that much of the FBI investigation was merely political theater for voters designed to placate Republicans while Clinton was able to build up election delegates and topple rival Bernie Sanders.

After hearing about the senators’ letter to the FBI, presidential spokesperson Sarah Huckabee Sanders said that these developments prove that “Jim Comey was not the right person to lead the FBI.” It should be recalled that on May 9, President Trump fired Comey, stating that he had lost confidence in the bureau director.

Francis arrives Myanmar, at the start of a delicate visit in midst of Rohingya crisis

Pope Francis greets children as he arrives at Yangon International Airport in Yangon, Myanmar, Nov. 27. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)

YANGON, MYANMAR — Pope Francis has become the first pontiff to travel to Myanmar, landing here Nov. 27 for a three-day visit as the majority Buddhist nation is facing international outcry over its persecution of a minority Rohingya Muslim population.

Almost immediately upon arrival, the pope made a change to his schedule for his visit here, moving ahead a meeting with Myanmar’s top military leader by three days and making the encounter his first official appointment in the country.

Francis met with Senior General Min Aung Hlaing during the evening of Nov. 27, in what Vatican spokesman Greg Burke called a 15-minute courtesy visit in which the pope and the general “spoke of the great responsibility of the country’s authorities in this moment of transition.”

Francis is visiting Myanmar Nov. 27-30 before heading to neighboring Bangladesh, where the U.N. says some 537,000 Rohingya have fled from violence in Myanmar’s western state of Rakhine.

The Myanmar military says it launched operations against the Rohingya earlier in the year following insurgent attacks in Rakhine. The top U.N. human rights official, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, said in September that the military operations were “clearly disproportionate” to the original insurgent attacks and had resulted in “a textbook example of ethnic cleansing.”

While Myanmar began a process of democratic reforms in 2015 after a half-century of military rule, the armed forces still have substantial power in the nation, including control of 25 percent of the seats in Parliament.

The meeting between the pope and the general took place at the archbishop’s residence in Yangon, where Francis is staying. Four other military officers also took part, and a representative from the Catholic Church in Myanmar provided translation.

Francis had originally been scheduled to meet with Hlaing on Nov. 30, following meetings with de facto Prime Minister Aung San Suu Kyi and other political leaders.

When the pope arrived in Yangon earlier Nov. 27, a small delegation of about a dozen schoolchildren dressed in traditional clothes and most of the country’s 22 bishops met him on the tarmac at the airport after his 10-hour overnight flight from Rome.

Hundreds of other schoolchildren, dressed in white t-shirts, waving yellow flags and chanting “Viva il Papa,” lined the streets outside the airport as Francis headed into central Yangon in an older model blue Toyota sedan.

The pontiff begins his six-day, two country foreign voyage with a delicate diplomatic mission ahead.

Human rights advocates want the pontiff to confront Suu Kyi, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, over her country’s treatment of the Rohingya. But local church leaders have advised him to refrain while in the country from specifically mentioning the Rohingya by name, for fear of reprisals from Myanmar’s military.

Francis did not say much about his visit during a brief meeting with journalists aboard the papal flight from Rome, which left late in the evening of Nov. 26. But he told Italian President Sergio Mattarella in a traditional telegram upon leaving Italy that he was headed to Myanmar to “encourage the small but fervent Catholic community and meet believers of diverse religions.”

Yangon Cardinal Charles Bo has said frequently in recent days that he advised Francis to refrain from using the word Rohingya while in Myanmar. The cardinal reiterated his advice in a Nov. 25 interview with Vatican Radio, saying the pope “has to be very careful about what terms he will use” so “we request him just to refrain from using the word Rohingya.”


Pope Francis greets members of the media aboard his flight from Rome to Yangon, Myanmar, Nov. 26. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)

Francis is staying in Yangon each night in Myanmar, but will travel about 200 miles north Nov. 28 to the capital of Naypyidaw, where he will meet Suu Kyi and President Htin Kyaw, an ally of the Nobel laureate.

After separate private encounters with Suu Kyi and Kyaw, Francis is scheduled to address them and Myanmar’s other political leaders publicly. His address is expected to draw attention either with a reference to the Rohingya or with the absence of such a reference.

On the days following the visit to Myanmar’s capital, Francis is to celebrate a Mass for the country’s small Catholic community, meet with the country’s bishops, and speak to the state-controlled supreme council of Myanmar’s Sangha Buddhists.

Myanmar is estimated to be about 90 percent Buddhist. According to the Vatican’s 2015 statistics, the latest available, the country has about 659,000 Catholics out of a population of some 52 million.

The Vatican announced Francis’ visit to Myanmar and Bangladesh Aug. 28, before full details of Myanmar military’s operation against the Rohingya were known. The trip was initially seen as a way for Francis — who had the Vatican establish full diplomatic relations with Myanmar for the first time in May after a visit to Rome by Suu Kyi — to support the country’s transition to democracy.

The pope has spoken specifically about Myanmar’s treatment of the Rohingya in the past. In remarks following his weekly Sunday Angelus prayer in St. Peter’s Square Aug. 27, for example, he said he had learned of the “persecution” of “our Rohingya brothers and sisters” and asked for prayer that they would be “given their full rights.”

Francis is to travel Nov. 30 to Bangladesh, before returning to Rome Dec. 2.

Is Bill Gates a Chinese communist spy? Using stolen/hacked USA scientific research? #POTUS


BillGatestraitor Wheres Billy boy?

China has invested heavily in scientific development in recent years, as it seeks to overtake the United States and Europe as a global scientific powerhouse.

The academy’s selection of foreign members is part of this effort to strengthen China’s presence and influence in engineering, science, and technology, the organisation said on its website.

The academy also pledged to continue studying and implementing the “spirit” of the 19th Party Congress, a phrase trotted out frequently by state media after the event in October, which saw Xi consolidate his grip on power.

Apart from Gates, the other 17 newly inducted foreign scholars included mechanical engineering professor Shixin Jack Hu from the University of Michigan; Stephen P Boyd, an electrical engineering professor from Stanford in Connecticut; and Zhengzhou University’s Nicholas Robert Lemoine, dean of the academy of medical sciences. Forty nine new Chinese members were also selected.

There were already…

View original post 87 more words

2 More Whistleblowers Divulge Involvement in Secret Space Program

20 and Back

is the standard phrase use to describe the tour of duty undergone by recruits into the SSP (Secret Space Program). The term 20 and back refers to the 20 year commitment that these military men and women make when they sign up to go into space – or the amount of time they are forced to serve as slaves. Recent whistleblowers to divulge their involvement in the SSP are Tony Rodrigues (who went public in 2016) and Michael Gerloff (who went public this year in 2017). Their testimonies are remarkable, and echo the accounts and experiences of many other whistleblowers who have recalled lost memories and/or gone public with their story of having been part of the SSP. These include Michael Relfe, Arthur Neumann (aka Henry Deacon), Andy Basiago, Bernard Mendez, Michael Prince, Max Spiers, Randy Cramer (aka Captain K or Kaye) and Corey Goode. Their accounts vary in credibility, however the similarities are striking. Many of these men talk about having set foot on Mars, but only some (Relfe, Cramer and Goode) specifically refer to the 20 and backmilitary program – as Rodrigues and Gerloff do.

20 and Back = Time Travel and Age Regression

One of the alleged hallmarks of the 20 and back program is that it involves highly advanced technology (time travel and age regression) whereby the recruit, at the end of his/her service, is actually brought back in time to the point at which he/she signed up – plus they are age regressed to be brought back to their age at that time. This means, in effect, that they gain a whole extra 20 years’ experience in life (although often those memories are inaccessible and buried deep within their subconscious). In other words, they live that same age range/period in their lives twice over, in different places doing different things, and only one of those timelines remains active.

20 and Back: Tony Rodrigues Worked as a Slave on a Cargo Ship in the SSP

Tony Rodrigues was abducted as a young boy and eventually ended up in the 20 and back program. He claims he was abducted by 5 aliens after teasing another kid in his grade whose father was high up in the Illuminati. He had Grey ETs in his house. He met a funny Reptilian who joked around with him and did a Bruce Lee impersonation. He ended up in a situation where he was used with other children as sex slaves in Seattle at age 13. He underwent brutal training, including sexual abuse and being forced to attend Satanic ritual and engage in cannibalism. He or his group tested as “theta” (psychic). Later on at age 16 in 1988, he went to the Moon.

During his time in the SSP, Tony was treated as a slave and had to work incredibly hard. He and the other recruits were treated with a “carrot and stick” mentality, i.e. either rewarded or punished. He worked as cargo officer on a ship within the Solar System dropping off cargo at various bases (including moons of other planets e.g. Enceladus on Saturn). He reveals how some of the cargo was advanced alien technology (nuclear missiles far more sophisticated than terrestrial nuclear weapons). He mostly worked on Ceres (the largest asteroid in Solar System, in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter). There was a large base concealed in darkness at a location on Ceres where the sun doesn’t shine. Tony recalls visiting many Earth-like planets during his SSP time.

The fact that he recalls so many details (some minor, some major) from his time working in the SSP lends credence to his account. For instance, he saw the Nazi eagle a lot on the uniforms of officials who commanded him (sometimes with a swastika below, sometimes with other symbols); he saw Ahuna Mons out of his spaceship window; he saw other spaceships in hangars; he describes a giant train station in Ceres with giant horses (built with scaffolding) in an underground cavern; the slave workers were constantly spied on, but no one could see the cameras; despite being a slave, he occasionally got paid small amounts (e.g. $20) in a currency called “Franks” which looked like an old Germanic currency; there were facial recognition technological devices for shopping there; there were automatic translators (English <=> German) so he could converse with some of the (grumpy) middle-aged female German shopkeepers there; there was artificial telepathy (with a machine, as opposed to natural/organic telepathy); and he used an incredibly fast train system there for transportation. This train system used magnetics. You could get anywhere on Ceres within 30 minutes, despite the fact that it’s 580 miles in diameter.

You can watch some of his interviews here and here.

20 and back 2-USMC-Boot-Camp-JUNE-1978-1

20 and back Attached-Letter-From-Ike-Skelton-1


20 and back USMC DD214

20 and back Discharge-USMC-DD256-1

20 and Back: Michael Gerloff Watched from a Young Age

Michael Gerloff is a Marine whistleblower who claims he was recruited into the SSP at age 18 in 1978. He displayed psychic abilities from young age, e.g. at age 3 he had left his body and had a OBE (Out of Body Experience). Gerloff later found out that his DNA doesn’t match that of his parents. Gerloff doesn’t have as much memory recall as Rodrigues, but the way he describes being recruited into (and returned from) the SSP is fascinating. He claims he was training to be a Marine when, in the middle of a test, he was taken aside by a captain and invited to be part of the space corps (this is in line with Randy Cramer’s claims of working for the UMSC s. s. or the United States Marine Corps special section).

Once Gerloff accepted, he was taken to a room with a load of paperwork, and recalls Lockheed Martin being part of that paperwork. He asked the captain if he could make a call, which the captain denied, but the captain did say he would send Gerloff’s family a military telegram (a “Marsgram”) to let them know that Gerloff was safe. Gerloff remembers being told about the 20 and back program, and being promised that he would be brought back in time at the completion of his tour of duty.

After the 20 years had passed, he was taken right back to the very moment where he signed up, into the same room, into the same chair, with the same captain sitting there. He was very dazed and discombobulated, and he couldn’t quite work out what had happened. He went to serve in the regular Marine corps for some time. He recalls that there was something about that Marsgram telegram, and about conflict with North Korea (topical in the news now), that may have been intended to trigger his memories. He also recalls some interesting details: after his time in the SSP, when he went to serve in the regular Marines, he sustained a calf injury and noticed (during Boot Camp) that it began festering as though his body were rejecting something. He pulled out a small, mucus-like sphere (the size of a BB gun pellet). He flushed it down the toilet at the time, but now in hindsight thinks it was a tracking device. He also recalls volunteering for experiments with a new Big Pharma drug called halcyon in a military program.

In his interviews, Gerloff displays a strong commitment to the truth. He states that “secrecy has made us less as a nation.” Was he officially sanctioned to come forward at this time with his disclosure testimony by a USMC Intelligence Group running the Space Marines?

You can find some of his interviews here.

How Credible Are These Whistleblowers?

The big question with these whistleblower testimonies will always be: how credible are they? In Gerloff’s case, he has some documentation, but it relates to his time in the regular part of the military, not the space branch. Dr. Michael Salla, a leading expert in the area of Exopolitics and a man to whom many new whistleblowers turn, states that he vetted Rodrigues (with the help of 2 of Salla’s colleagues) for over 1 year before publicly interviewing him. In general, I trust Salla’s judgment, although it should be noted that another great researcher in the field Bill Ryan (co-founder of Project Camelot and current moderator of Project Avalon) vehemently speaks out against the credibility of whistleblower Corey Goode, whom Salla believes and whose information Salla uses. Bill Ryan outlines his grave concerns about Goode’s truthfulness in several places including this interview with “Dark Journalist” Daniel Liszt.

In discussing how credible Goode (aka GoodETxSG) is, Salla writes:

“In my own database of whistleblowers, contactees, leaked documents and breaking news on the secret space program(s), I have found nothing awry in GoodETxSG’s claims. His claim of separate space programs is consistent with Randy Cramer’s claims that he served with the Earth Defense Force (a multinational alliance) for 17 years on Mars to defend five civilian bases belonging to the Mars Colony Corporation. In his alleged 17 years on Mars, Cramer claims he never once ventured into the Mars Colony Corporation facilities, even for R & R. That appeared strange to me when I first heard of it. That degree of formal separation between military and corporate bases on Mars, however, supports GoodETxSG’s claims of separate space programs.

GoodETxSG claims that he served a 20 year tour of service with the secret space program(s) before being age-regressed back to a time shortly after his duty began. Essentially this allowed him to live a 20 year time-span twice. Also, his memories were wiped or “blank-slated” and GoodETxSG, now a civilian, was encouraged not to rejoin any military service in case that triggered memory recall of his prior 20 year service. This is consistent with the claims of Michael Relfe (The Mars Record) and Randy Cramer (Earth Defense Force) who say they went through a similar security process.”

Final Thoughts

With any kind of whistleblower testimony, you have to develop your own discernment filter to attempt to gauge the truthhood of it. The above 2 whistleblowers may be pioneers pointing the way to a parallel breakaway civilization which is developing and unfolding in staggering ways, right as we live our normal lives on Earth. Certainly, there are similarities among what 20 and back whistleblowers Michael Relfe, Randy Cramer, Corey Goode, Tony Rodrigues and Michael Gerloff are telling us. In Relfe’s case, the information was drawn out over a long period of time by Stephanie Relfe (later his wife), a professional therapist who conducted hypnotherapy sessions with him. In so many ways, truth is stranger than fiction.




Journey towards universal values and enlightenment

Harbidemy's blog



Rachel D. Adams

The Official Site

Figment of imagination

How to teach a difficult child

Teaching techniques to help a difficult child in learning and education. | Parenting | Homeschooling | Short stories and parenting diaries



Leverage Ambition

be you, be great


If you feel happy, Smile with all your heart


Framing local, underground content, from culture, fashion to current affairs. This is culture on the go...!

Mental Health Warriors

Obliterating the stigma, saving lives.

Raw Healing

a place to be vulnerable because we are all healing from something

Orange Strokes