The Clintons are still in full command, but are killing the brand and lost the election

The Democrats and their globalist handlers are turning against the Clintons just as Infowars predicted on Oct. 24, with former DNC head Donna Brazile in particular exposing how Hillary Clinton stole the nomination from Bernie Sanders.

Brazile published a bombshell exposé in Politico, a left-leaning outlet, revealing three key points on how the Clinton campaign controlled the party BEFORE Hillary was chosen as the nominee, how the DNC shafted the more popular candidate Bernie Sanders and how the Clinton campaign robbed Democratic state parties by funneling money to her campaign headquarters in Brooklyn.

Infowars predicted the Clintons would be sacrificedbecause their self-centered behavior no longer serves the interests of the elites, and now we’re seeing the first prominent Democrat turn against them.

This is the first salvo of a civil war inside the party as Democrats realize Hillary is the party’s worst enemy, especially as Republicans consolidate their control over state governments once steered by Democrats who lost their money to the Clinton campaign.

“Hillary’s campaign was grabbing money from the state parties for its own purposes, leaving the states with very little to support down-ballot races,” Brazile revealed. “A Politicostory published on May 2, 2016, described the big fund-raising vehicle she had launched through the states the summer before, quoting a vow she had made to rebuild ‘the party from the ground up … when our state parties are strong, we win. That’s what will happen.’”

“Yet the states kept less than half of 1 percent of the $82 million they had amassed from the extravagant fund-raisers Hillary’s campaign was holding.”

Interestingly, Brazile may simply be revealing some of what’s on the seized laptop of former DNC head Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, which was surrendered to DC Capitol Police by former IT staffer Imran Awan.

Regardless, Brazile’s confessions have rekindled the anger of Bernie Sander supporters who correctly speculated that Hillary Clinton stole the nomination from their candidate, who, unlike Clinton, could fill stadiums anywhere in the country.

Sanders supporters were so irate that the DNC made sure to isolate them in a public park at least a half-mile away from the DNC convention to keep the media focused on Hillary’s coronation, but Infowars refused to ignore these real Democrats who were screwed over by the process:

Brazile even admitted that Sanders was more popular than Hillary at the peak of the campaign.

“I did not trust the polls,” she said. “I told [Sanders] I had visited states around the country and I found a lack of enthusiasm for her everywhere.”

Beware the De-Testosteronization of Men

Recently I watched an old science fiction movie in which a group of macho astronauts accidentally time travel to the year 2525 in America. A nuclear war has wiped out the world as we know it and everyone now lives underground. The men of this ‘new world’ all wear tight metallic jump suits and are completely wimpified (think Dr. Zachary Smith from Lost In Space). They are basically afraid of their own shadows, and even more afraid of the guns the astronauts are carrying.   The women, all young and beautiful (of course) despise the wimpy men and love the macho astronauts and the children are, according to one of the astronauts, “mealy-mouthed and pale” with no energy, dull. As a result, civilization is slowly dying.

Unfortunately if a similar movie were made today about America’s future it might go something like this:

“Planet Neutral is a world where all forms of evil are diminished because men are no longer in charge. Feminist leftists accomplish this by replacing fluoride in the water for chemicals that remove testosterone. Thus all war is ended. Christianity, the Constitution, guns, and money are finally eliminated. Could America finally become the utopian society imagined by the non-gendered people of Planet Neutral? One can only hope! Starring Ashley Judd, Rosie O’Donnell, and Hillary Clinton making her acting debut as The Neutral Woman/Man, Grog.”

Is it possible that this is already happening in America today? Unless I’m in Texas, I honestly worry about the de-testosteronization of men, with guys so terrified of insulting people with their masculinity they’re becoming more ‘gender neutral’ so as not to frighten anyone.

With the recent “Warlock Hunt” regarding Casting Couches—both in Hollywood and in the news industry–we need to be prepared to not only protect and defend women (and men) who have been legitimately abused, but we must also be watchful about the way men-in-general are potentially going to be targeted. Because make no mistake: today’s feminists believe ALL MEN are predatorsviolent cavemen, ‘rapists waiting to find their victims’ and they are ready and willing to pounce on the latest barrage of accusations as proof of their beliefs. With today’s feminists, if a man is accused of anything sexual, he is guilty. Period. We’ve already seen this happening on college campuses, where kissing is considered ‘sexual assault’ and hearing a dirty joke is considered ‘sexual harassment’.

(I can already see the headlines on Leftist sites: “Blogger Defends Testosterone!” “Blogger Condones Rape!” Sigh…) 

The truth is, many men are already becoming afraid of their own shadows, terrified of offending anyone with their masculinity. Even the fashion industry is trying, once again, to force non-threatening, gender-neutral clothing into America. And it’s slowly starting to work. (Notice in the attached picture how the men are standing with their shoulders slouched, looking somewhat defeated, weary…)

So what do we do?  How do we get back to a time when men didn’t have to worry about getting accused of sexual harassment for simply complimenting a woman? In a world where men are constantly beaten down for being ‘men’, how do we reverse the psychology of calling ‘masculinity’ a bad thing?

It starts at home, and it needs to start now. For many decades, leftists have slowly, steadily been trying to erase the differences between girls and boys. So parents need to reinforce on a daily basis that no matter what they hear in school or on television, that there are distinct differences between girls and boys. Be specific and be literal. Explain why boys are boys, and girls are girls. Explain the biological, emotional, and physical differences between the two sexes. Answer their questions. Listen to their concerns. Teach them how to defend themselves and their beliefs.

If not, we are absolutely on our way to becoming Planet Neutral.

If the complicity is true, then all the players are worse than pigs!


Whistleblower reveals HHS misconduct

Del Bigtree, producer of VAXXED, joins David Knight to blow the whistle on misconduct by HHS (Health & Human Services). When the federal government took away our right to sue vaccine companies, giving them liability immunity, HHS was tasked as the sole means of protecting the public. But they don’t test vaccines like drugs are tested, they don’t allow discovery in their “court”, they don’t even keep records of those injured. The cover-up is bigger than JFK and may cost you and your children your health, even your life.

To read more about this topic click here.

Below is an article by Jefferey Jaxen that details the HHS cover-up.

It’s official! The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and, by extension, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been put on legal notice. The notice requests confirmation that certain obligations regarding vaccine safety have been or will be fulfilled.

Why the HHS? Due the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the 1986 Act), the HHS shoulders virtually all responsibility for assuring the safety of vaccines being administered to America’s 78 million children. The 1986 Act allows Congress to step in if any act or duty ensuring vaccine safety is abandoned or failed. As it stands, such a burden falls upon the shoulders of the Acting Secretary of the HHS, Eric D. Hargan, and his agency.

After decades of its government passing the buck, avoiding reality, and ignoring the science, America has had enough. An awakening is hitting breakaway speeds as communities are rejecting coercive vaccination practices. Parents have leveraged and dominated social media platforms to sound the alarm about long-failed policies. Meanwhile, a submissive American medical community has forgotten its ethic of informed consent and lost sight of its original oath to do no harm.

The notice was served recently by a non-profit organization Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) founded by Del Bigtree. What is ICAN asking? There are 11 specific questions and points in the notice that previous HHS and CDC leadership should have addressed. But here we are, in 2017, having to serve our government oversight body a legal notice to ensure they do their stated duties.

ICAN’s questions and points are as follows:

Please explain how HHS justifies licensing any pediatric vaccine without first conducting a long-term clinical trial in which the rate of adverse reactions is compared between the subject group and a control group receiving an inert placebo?

Please list and provide the safety data relied upon when recommending babies receive the Hepatitis B vaccine on the first day of life?

Please explain why HHS failed to cooperate with Harvard to automate VAERS reporting? And detail any steps that HHS has taken since toward automating VAERS reporting?

Please explain any specific steps taken by HHS to improve adverse reaction reporting to VAERS?

For each of the 38 vaccine-injury pairs reviewed in the 1994 IOM Report which the IOM found lacked studies to determine causation, please identify the studies undertaken by the HHS to determine whether each injury is caused by vaccination?

For each of the 135 vaccine-injury pairs reviewed in the 2011 IOM Report which the IOM found lacked studies to determine causation, please identify the studies undertaken by the HHS to determine whether each injury is caused by vaccination?

Please explain what HHS has done to assure that health care providers record the manufacturer and lot number for each vaccine they administer?

Please advise when HHS intends to begin conducting research to identify which children are susceptible to serious vaccine injury? If HHS believes it has commenced this research, please detail its activities regarding same?

Please confirm that HHS shall forthwith remove the claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from the CDC website, or alternatively, please identify the specific studies on which HHS bases its blanket claim that no vaccines cause autism?

Please advise whether HHS intends to forthwith conduct adequately powered and controlled prospective as well as retrospective studies comparing total health outcomes of fully/partially vaccinated children with completely unvaccinated children?

Regarding conflicts of interest and possible steps to reduce them, ICAN’s legal notice asks if HHS will:

A. prohibit conflict waivers for members of HHS’s vaccine committees (ACIP, VRBPAC, NVAC & ACCV)?
B. prohibit HHS vaccine committee members or HHS employees with duties involving vaccines from accepting any compensation from a vaccine maker for five years?
C. require that vaccine safety advocates comprise half of HHS’s vaccine committees?
D. allocate toward vaccine safety an amount at least equal to 50% of HHS’s budget for promoting/purchasing vaccines?
E. support the creation of a vaccine safety department independent of HHS?
F. support the repeal of the 1986 Act to the extent it grants immunity to pharmaceutical companies for injuries caused by their vaccine products?

The US regulatory failure and avoidance of responsibility from official organs of the government has reached a crescendo of legendary proportions. People at all levels of American society have provided sustained and ample opportunity for the right moves to take place by the HHS to correct massive failures inherent within the vaccine industry and its regulatory oversight. The People have been patient even as their loved ones around them have generationally shouldered the burdens of physical injury from vaccine products with known, long-standing risks. America has collectively stood by and waited with stoic patience for politicians to act as both its brain trust and wealth has been extracted for little more than pharmaceutical industry profit. In the absence of self-correcting regulatory agencies and in the face of inept political action, the American people have activated through a true grassroots movement birthed from loss and suffering at the hands of vaccine injury.

For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of multiple US government agencies in regards to vaccine safety, their previous behaviors that have led us all to this point have mirrored those of a hopeless addict. Our country’s history of the past decades are marred by government’s continuous unwillingness to see the harm caused by their own actions while doubling-down at every opportunity to reverse the addiction when clear issues have presented themselves. It is both ICAN and the American people’s hope that HHS will give full, detailed responses to its failures and plans for their immediate remedies. At the very least, it is now imperative that HHS admit the numerous shortcomings of vaccine safety oversight in hopes of starting down the path towards correcting errors that have compounded over the decades into a monumental catastrophe resulting in real human injury.

Making it clear that this is not a public relations stunt or simply lip service, the ICAN notice explicitly states in the closing paragraph:

“If that is not possible, Congress, as a final resort to assure vaccine safety, authorized a “civil action … against the Secretary where there is alleged a failure of the Secretary to perform any act or duty under the 1986 Act. (42 U.S.C. § 300aa-31(a).) We are prepared to authorize such an action and this letter constitutes the notice required by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-31(b).”

FBI agents manhandled Manafort and his wife during pre-dawn raid in intimidation effort

Blithe Spirit

Gestapo stuff:

Just how rough special counsel Robert Mueller is playing with Paul Manafort goes back before this week’s indictment — to the FBI’s no-knock raid in July.

They picked lock, barged in, pre-dawn, 12 of them with guns drawn, felt up the wife in bed for guns, with intent to traumatize, says source.

Typical of Mueller’s top prosecutor, Andrew Weissmann. ” A former mob prosecutor in New York, [who] specializes in turning witnesses against bigger prey and is not afraid to make things rough for spouses, too.”

In the United States of America. The FBI in peace and war.

From: Washington Times

View original post